You’re trying to read a semi-novel witty story based on Stuart Hilton’s review of “Modern British Making” and my interpretation of the impact blockchain has on the world today. I found it fascinating how the description of front-runner technology in the industrial era resembled the awe and fear of modern blockchain. Some citations are so relevant that changing “Railway Company” to “Blockchain Protocol” will give you the same shillings.
After some “bubbles” (actually eight so far) and some huge announcements — do you remember Libra and TON? — I thought it was a good time to do it coin A history of emerging technologies that could be the biggest innovations in the last 500 years (intended for puns).
Why bother? From a distance of the second century, it is difficult to grasp, or even believe, the impact that railroad development must have had at the beginning of the 19th century. In a similar way, a common observer is Bitcoin (BTC) An evangelist who preaches the end of the dollar and crypto skeptics of major banks. In fact, there is no clear trend as to what to expect from distributed ledger technology in the coming decades.
The physical impact of the railroad was dramatic. “Big mechanical horses, sucking fire and smoke, attracting unimaginably heavy trains at unimaginable speeds, demanding their passage across the landscape changing by embankments, cuts, viaducts and tunnels. Stuart Hilton portrays the powerful role that often terrifying and speculative emerging industries have played in the UK. This is an example chosen for a thorough review.
The author engaged me in informative and interesting storytelling. It was like a nearly parallel retrospective to the blockchain industry. Blockchain can confuse authoritarian regimes and propaganda planes, as railroads have “transformed the way war is carried out and the way peace is maintained.” Early trains proved to be one of the main drivers of “dramatic industrial growth in the 19th century,” so blockchain revolutionizes finance, the main artery that pumps blood into the current economy. can do. Railroads have been forced to “rethink laissez-faire policies, where the state was in the default position,” but blockchain is still a major force in liberating people around the world and returning their assets. is not.
Below is a summary of what crypto has done for us using the railroad analogy (and the structure of my future articles on this topic).
Shock and first cipher
Electronic currency and triple entry accounting preceded Bitcoin.Blockchain properties of recent blocks that use hashes to link to the previous block date Later, scholars Stuart Haber and Scott Stornetta devised a way to time stamp digital documents to resolve intellectual property rights. They invented a time-series chain of hash data in 1991 and verified its reliability. It was used in the New York Times issue four years later.
Cryptologists did not intend to create ambitious projects, but a series of discoveries led Satoshi Nakamoto to launch the Bitcoin protocol in response to unfair and opaque global banking.As Bruniske and Tatar emphasize in their books Cryptocurrency, Cryptocurrencies have gradually captured the hearts of people ranging from cyberpunk to dealers and traders. What is this Proof of Work (PoW) anyway, until journalists ask interesting questions?
Ironically, Satoshi didn’t mention “blockchain” in the 2008 white paper. In 2014, the “distributed ledger” was changed to “[t]He is an important innovation in digital currencies. The following year, when Bloomberg Markets published an article titled “Blythe Masters Turns Banks into Banks, Blockchain Changes Everything,” and economists published “Trust Machine,” two popular financial magazines said this. Raised awareness of the concept.
“What’s clearly more ridiculous than the prospect of a locomotive moving twice as fast as a stagecoach?” Written in The Conservative Journal, The Quarterly Review, 1825.
Similarly, people didn’t understand the gist of blockchain at first. Some people welcomed it as a premise of Bitcoin and emphasized the cryptocurrency aspect of this technology.others found Why it doesn’t succeed. Interestingly, the banks themselves ignored the idea of sharing the ledger with other parties and later actively opposed it. Shortly before they fully embraced the idea and began joining numerous consortia such as We.Trade and R3.
“This magnificent creation has a source of intellectual, moral and political interests beyond all measurements and all prices,” said the other side with the opening of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway in 1830. The quarterly review we are taking said.
The first railroad existed long before George Stephenson and was mainly used for freight applications such as coal transportation from mines. When the steam engine unleashed a new force, people still regarded the railroad as a bulky, sketchy, or even dangerous “problem-free solution.” Steam locomotives needed to establish their rights to the future through the 1829 Rainhill Trials. This reminds Visa and SWIFT of their days coming to an end, or the struggle of blockchain proponents to convince Andreas Antonoplos. win What they have in common before the Canadian Senate.
In 1864, William I of Prussia stated, “You can ride a horse for free in one hour from Berlin to Potsdam, but you cannot pay for it in one hour.”
“Passengers who cannot breathe die of suffocation, making it impossible to travel by train at high speeds,” said Dionysius Lardner of the Steam Engine Familiarly Explained and Illustrated in 1824.
Very skeptical, railroads continued to improve as most risk takers foresaw tremendous potential and could risk money and careers to build on new technologies. .. Suddenly, the railroad challenged time and space itself. People restricted within the territory by horse speed can be exposed to a much wider continent.Today, in the midst of the Third Industrial Revolution, blockchain promise Confront the holistic idea of value exchange and humanity by providing a brave new world. It is inevitable. So what happens next?
This article does not contain any investment advice or recommendations. All investment and transaction movements carry risks and readers need to do their own research when making decisions.
The views, ideas and opinions expressed herein are for the author only and do not necessarily reflect or express the views or opinions of Cointelegraph.
Katia Shabanova Is the founder of Forward PR Studio and has over 20 years of experience implementing programs for IT companies, from Fortune 1000 companies and venture capital to initial public offering (IPO) startups. She holds a bachelor’s degree in English and German studies from Santa Clara University in California and a master’s degree in linguistics from the University of Göttingen in Germany. She has been published in Benzinga, Investing, iTWire, Hackernoon, Macwelt, Embedded Computing Design, CRN, CIO, Security Magazine and more.